Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)

Antonio Dolcetta on Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:01:48 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:01:32 +0100
In-reply-to: <2f4350400612110255j415cb19bq4e96caeccd8860d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200612082139.09513.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <u1wn993p1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612090636s5af065dam7bce1b85517714c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612090905w136b5c3dsb5a76af7cbe0d1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <uodqb65gz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1GtTNb-00026X-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457D2EBD.1000802@xxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612110255j415cb19bq4e96caeccd8860d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)

shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I will follow this one with interest.
>
>   
>> I submit my own RFJ with the following statement:
>> {{This is RFJ 007}}
>>     
>
> False, surely, since it will be some other RFJ number?
>
>   
surely, but let's not underestimate the potential for creative judging, 
we might still be surprised.



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
  - From: shadowfirebird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread