Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo (now with more drama!)

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

I will follow this one with interest.

> I submit my own RFJ with the following statement:
> {{This is RFJ 007}}

False, surely, since it will be some other RFJ number?

I must admit I could not follow the logic of the ruling on RFJ #7
myself - but since my following the logic isn't required, and there is
nothing anyone can do about it anyway...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss