Re: [s-d] A different RFJ system (draft)

["Jake Eakle" <jseakle@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
> > c) Again, instead of the Administrator doing it, probably better to just
> say
> > that it is done.
>
> Well, *someone* has to do it. :) To me, it seems wiser to specify that
> the Admin does it, because that can later on be changed to the Grand
> Poobah or the Vice-Minister of Loving Beatings, or whomever. If it's
> not stated that someone does it, then who does it?


Right now, according to Rule 1-5, someone does not in fact have to do it.
Things just happen to the gamestate, and the Administrator is responsible
for letting us know/interpreting anything ambiguous.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss