| shadowfirebird on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:36:30 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Judgement draft |
> Well, I like your idea of having links in the rules to the relevant RFJs (or vice versa) but I think having it as a rule is not a great idea, because that way the administrator is FORCED to do it, [...] > For now, I dont want to scare Peter off right at the beginning. Good point. Me neither. > The appeal process is going to be my next proposal. Actually I was going to propose there not being any appeal process at all. All RFJs are final, and may only be overturned by proposal. How about that ? Well, then there IS an appeal process - you make a proposal. I'm a newbie; don't ask me if it would work! But you need to put the "all RFJs are final" in, I think... _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss