Re: [s-d] Judgement draft

[antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx]

Well, they are game documents, so I think that is handled automatically. It's the administrator's responsibility to keep every player informed of the state of the game, he can do it in the way he prefers best.
They'll probably end up on the wiki together with rules and historical proposals.


----- Original Message ----
From: "shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx" <shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 12:57:33 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] Judgment draft

Resolved RFJs should probably be held in a public place - ideally,
against the rule(s) that they judge?

On 11/24/06, antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> for instance, i should remove the "The
> Administrator is the authority used to interpret the current state of
> the game." caluse from rule 1-5
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 12:26:41 PM
> Subject: [s-d] Judgement draft
>
> Hi all,
> I have written a draft (already wikified) for a proposal implementing Judgement.
> I would very much appreciate if you tell me what problems you can spot
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


-- 
It's Like This

Even the Samurai
Have teddy bears
And even the teddy bears
Get drunk
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss