Re: [s-d] comex submitted Props 352 & 353

comex on Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:23:32 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] comex submitted Props 352 & 353

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] comex submitted Props 352 & 353
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:23:27 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=H8teb+Zhb+cHp84iZgERexLY7xqCIf86ypHUU+0rYXi3Bw/hjznEFCRwKwqoSkMq7EfrJuXeIZpu93/0X3cxxC/y+tFR+Y6jdKGQ9SYrFt1KHtoS//mWL6meeuoYdZxtgEdGWtpj1t6fKlT2Enh9LlQWbFowVMiHYdooDY0gK5w=
In-reply-to: <410-22006102921820950@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <410-22006102921820950@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> You could eliminate the boolean Lit/Dark nature that
> exists now, and state instead an integer value of
> 'litness'. 1 or greater for Lit; less than 1 for Dark.
>
> Rules 10-8 (Vision) and 10-10 (Grue) would have to be
> changed to refer to Lighting Level instead of Lit/Dark,
> and ALL Talismans, Rooms and Superpowers would
> have to use the same standard for altering Lighting
> Level.

What is the problem with having a shorthand way of specifying whether
a room is lit up or not?

I think I've fixed the other points.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] comex submitted Props 352 & 353
  - From: Mark Walsh

Prev by Date: [s-d] comex submitted Props 352 & 353
Previous by thread: [s-d] comex submitted Props 352 & 353
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread