| Mark Walsh on Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:41:51 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [s-d] RE: [s-b] Peter submits p339 - Defendant's argument. |
On: 1/14/06 9:43:59 AM Triller sent: > Subject: [s-b] Peter submits p339 - Defendant's argument. > ..... > > [[ > > Plaintiff's Argument: ..... > > ]] > > --------------------------------- > [[ > Defendant's Argument: ..... > Triller > ]] I trust that posting a reply to your submission was the proper way to offer the defendant's arguments. I couldn't figure out a way to amend the initial CFI to include my arguments with the original motion. Triller _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss