Peter Cooper Jr. on Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:51:31 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [auto] Triller submits p306 |
"Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On: 12/12/05 4:49:46 PM Peter sent: >> I'm with Wonko on this here... If all you're doing is changing the >> public display to reflect reality, there's no need for a >> referendum. If not, I don't understand what it's trying to do. >> > That's all I'm going to do. 4-3 does state that a non Minister > making a change needs to post the change to a Public Forum. > I guess I assumed that Tidiness Referenda were (in part) a > Minister's Public Posting of intended changes. That wasn't my intent. The ministers get to update Public Displays to reflect reality without needing to post to a public forum, although it's probably a good idea to do so anyway. Executive Tidiness Referenda are designed to change reality when needed, in case reality is misspelled or otherwise incorrect. -- Peter C. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss