RE: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Triller submits p306

["Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On: 12/12/05 10:59:29 AM Wonko sent:
> Subject: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Triller submits p306
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:48 PM, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Triller has submitted a new Motion, p306.
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Motion 306/0: Talismanic Documents Require Uniformity
> > A Referendum by Triller
> > Last modified on nweek 102, nday 3
> >
> > An Executive Tidiness Referendum
> > This Motion becomes Open at the end of nday 3,
> > and resolves at the end of nday 5.
> >
> > [[ There is a bit of disparity in the form of the Talisman
> > definitions. Some are still refered to by their "uniqueness",
> > some don't have a declared type, and still others don't
> > include the inventory block. ]]
> >
> > {{
> > Amend the title block for each Talisman to include:
> > Name
> > Price
> > Rarity
> > Type.
> >
> > Add an inventory block to any Talisman definition
> > that does not already include one.
> > }}
>
> I don't think this needs a proposal - you can just go ahead and add 
> these things yourself, because you won't be changing anything about the 
> game, you'll just be changing the representation (the same way I could 
> edit the stylesheets without needing a tweak to do so).
>
> -- 
> Wonko
>
It's actually a Referendum and not a Proposal.
By the way the Rules have evolved (specifically
4-3) Executive Tidiness does seem a tad redundant.
(maybe there's a Proposal  in this).
I'll wait it out (and highlight all the problems in my
hardcopies so I only do it once).

Triller



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss