[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Triller submits p304

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 12, 2005, at 12:48 PM, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Triller has submitted a new Motion, p304.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Motion 304/0: Require Immediate Puzzle Pod Location Execution
> A Proposal by Triller
> Last modified on nweek 102, nday 3
>
> [[ RIPPLE ]]
> [[
> At present, a Player who picks up a Puzzle Pod gets a
> minimum of 24 hours notice that they're about to be
> whacked for holding it. This is also a disadvantage to
> a player who would use a Puzzling Contraption to
> move about because another Player could move a
> targeted Puzzle Pod anywhere during the nday delay.
> ]]
>
> In the effects field of Puzzling Contraption,
> Change the clause:
> {{
> One nday after
> }}
> to:
> {{
> At the end of the nday
> }}

If you do that, then you can use a Contraption at 23:59:00 UTC and the 
player holding the pod gets no time to get rid of it. The extra nday is 
there to prevent that; if you're going to remove that nday, you might 
as well remove the delay entirely and let it be instantaneous.

Perhaps instead it should take an extra movement point to move to 
another room while carrying a Puzzle Pod that's been targeted by a 
Contraption?

--
Wonko

"So I decided to explore randomness and some of the principles of 
quantum mechanics, through poetry, using the medium of sheep."
 -- Valerie Laws

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss