Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] DQT submits p152

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 12, 2005, at 5.44 PM, Dan Schmidt wrote:

> I made it a talisman because that's Golems main
> advantage. After all, what point would a class that
> confers no real advantages have?

The problem is that right now there's no way to get a Talisman except 
to forge one. If there's only one Golem, and it already exists, then 
nobody can get it and thus your golem form will sit unused until 
somebody repeals it.

What you could do, though, is make it an entirely new class of object. 
A gremlin-like thing, perhaps...
"There exists an object called the Dyslexic Q-Golem, or DQG. The DQG 
does the following things ..."

Maybe you could make a monster that stalks the Rooms of the House.

We'll need more Rooms, methinks.

> I was thinking that there should be more ways to
> uniquely customize oneself. Rather then have powers
> and abilities that are available to everyone I think
> that we should focus on powers only available to a
> single player or Quasi-Player. If players had unique
> abilities then it would make subgames much more
> interesting, especially if they are team subgames.

Classes are a step in that direction, as are unique talismans. Perhaps 
we should have Rumble-style Super Powers that players bid on?

--
Wonko

Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but the thing dies in the process 
and the innards are discouraging to any but the pure scientific mind.
     -E. B. White (1899 - 1985), Some Remarks on Humor, introduction

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss