eugman on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:04:41 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Wonko submits p146 |
Yes yes I know this. I've got all week. > > automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > >> Wonko has submitted a new proposal, p146. > >> [Allowing actions on private fora] > > > > I like the idea, but > > - I'm not sure it's a good plan to allow one to retroactively change > > what happened in the game. It might be okay, I'm just concerned > > since I'm hearing that we allow actions that could change history. > > - I think I'd prefer it if spoon-discuss were some kind of semi-public > > forum, which allowed optional recognition, as opposed to allowing > > actions in any private forum. If a private forum is any way for > > outsiders to communicate, I could recognize an action that my wife > > verbally told me or that someone emailed me, which seems like a bad > > idea. > > Making s-d a semi-public (protected?) forum would solve both problems, in > fact - my main motivation for making the retroactive clause was the fear > that a player communicating privately with another would jokingly say > something that the other player would then recognize and force them into > doing. > > I'll fix that later tonight. > > BTW, speaking of prop fixes, p140 (Inundatron, by Eugene) will have no > effect as it currently stands, because it attempts to define the Gibberish > Word without setting a new one. > > -- > Wonko > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss