Alex Truelsen on Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:43:35 -0500 (CDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] BvS submits p117

On 6/8/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > BvS has submitted a new proposal, p117.
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Proposal 117/0: Baron von Skippy
> > A Standard Proposal by BvS
> > Last modified on nweek 91, nday 1
> >
> > [[I have no idea what it will do to make a proposal that shares a name
> > with me, since I need to have a uniquely identifying name. I'm
> > thinking it will do nothing and I'll replace this with something when
> > it ceases to amuse me, but for now...]]
> Well, there's nothing in the rules that describes proposals as having
> names. The only things with names are the game, players, stories, and
> entries in the nbrgd dctnry. Rule 3-9.2.D refers to the Title of a
> proposal, but it's not really described anywhere. (It's one more
> reason to vote for p116, as it defines the title of game-changing
> objects.)
> > This proposal is Baron von Skippy.
> That's an interesting change to the state of the game. I don't think
> it'll do much right now to have one game object be both a player and a
> proposal. But it could be interesting.

Yeah, I have no idea what would happen. This is experimentation by the 
pushing of every button I see until something makes a noise.

> Peter C.
> "In fact, I'll go cancel some email right now."
> -- wschudy
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
spoon-discuss mailing list