Daniel Lepage on Tue, 24 May 2005 23:55:47 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Peter amends p104 |
On May 23, 2005, at 5.24 PM, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Peter has amended p104. --------------------------------- Proposal 104/2: Yes; no; maybe so A Standard Proposal by Peter Last modified on nweek 89, nday 7 <snip> In rule 3-4, change the last two paragrahs to the text {{When a Proposal changes from Open to Historical, each player whose Final Vote on it was not ABSTAIN gains 1A.When a Proposal Passes, for each Final Vote on the proposal that was FOR it, the proposal's owner gains 2A.When a Proposal Passes, for each Final Vote on the proposal that was MAYBE it, the proposal's owner gains 1A.
Why "MAYBE it" instead of just "MAYBE"? -- WonkoHow can you prove whether at this moment we are sleeping, and all our thoughts are a dream; or whether we are awake, and talking to one another in the waking state?
-- Plato _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss