[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Wonko votes

[eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx]

The party line of HIP is as follows:
Proposal 91/1: The Baron's Story, Chapter Two: Speeders Return (BvS)
Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos? (BvS)
We're for these. The first brings back Speeders, the second brings back 
the much-loved Default Case and thus makes this message legal.

> Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos?        : For
> This doesn't break the game because it doesn't permit anything that isn't 
> already permitted. It could be said to "permit" calvinball, inasmuch as anything 
> else that doesn't forbid it is implicitly permitting it; this doesn't change the 
> game at all. Go ahead, slap me with a herring. See if I care.

Ok so I ge that it doesn't break the game but I am still unable to grasp the usefulness of this prop.

Also why do we have people posting the party stance instead of of the members of a party subscribing to the party page to be emailed the new info? Why would I want to know what a differen't party supports?



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss