[s-d] Re: [auto] BvS submits p96

[pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.)]

automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> BvS has submitted a new proposal, p96.
>
> Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos?
> A Standard Proposal by BvS
> Last modified on nweek 89, nday 4
>
> Create a rule in section 1 of the ruleset:
>
> {{
> == Permissibility of the Indistinguishable ==
>
> Any action not explicitly prohibited by the rules is permissible and
> unprohibited.
>
> Any action indistinguishable from a legal Game Action is a legal Game
> Action.
> }}

And what would the advantage be of having this?

I rather like only allowing what the rules say are allowed...

-- 
Peter C.
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss