eugman on Sun, 15 May 2005 22:35:01 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] Lots of actions. |
> > For the cfi in which I am the defendant I declare this as my > > statement/defense ect... > > {{ > > Statement: Truth is beauty. Beauty is truth. Since Raelus's analysis > > lacks beauty is therefore lack truth and my proposal is a legal > > move.}} > I don't think a CFI was even necessary for this. It was clearly > illegal, and everyone can see that. Consider it removed from the > Ballot; the other props will be renumbered at the end of the nweek, > when I can do that safely (right now it would require a lot of > monkeying about with people's votes, and I don't want to mess those > up). E just wants more money. A reward for cfi's is a bad idea. > > I submit the cfi to get at peter. > > {{ > > == Nice try, Peter. == > > > > Defendant: Peter > > > > Statement: Peter's proprosal doesn't actually propose anything, is > > full of nonsense, makes no reference to the game and plagerized. > > Therefore p74 is invalid. > > > > Analysis by Plaintiff: > > The rules say that each Proposal consists of a list of Gamestate > > Changes, that is, changes to the state and/or existence of some number > > of Game Objects. P74 contains one line in the interrogative form and > > the rest are declarative. A proposal needs statments in the imperative > > form in order to command any changes to the gamestate. Now even though > > one is allowed to use a declarative to demonstrate the existence of a > > game object this proposal does not even do that. This proposal does > > not reference any existing game objects nor does it declare the > > existence of new ones. Instead is it full of lines about eternal > > summer and rough winds and other such rubbish. I therefore find this > > proposal not meeting its requirements of a proposal and has nothing to > > do with the game. > > }} > > I think Peter may be in the right here - a list can indeed be empty, > and nothing prevents nonsense or plagiarism. Truthfully I think it's up to interpretation. I'm saying his proposal does nothing a proposal does. He's arguing he is proposing everything stays just the same. We'll see how it turns out. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss