Daniel Lepage on Fri, 6 May 2005 16:28:29 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] TheVoice votes


> Proposal 54/0: Talismans and Delays                     : Against
> I'm for speeding up the game here...

I don't think this will slow the game down much especially in conjunction with shorter weeks. It will, however, force players to plan ahead and encourage us to actually hold things like Wands. I don't like the fact that Wands right now aren't used as objects. There's no reason to ever have a Wand, because if you need one you'll just create and destroy one in the same message. Soul Pennies do nothing for that, they just increase how long we have to wait before doing it again.

> Proposal 56/0: Raelus Overclocks Clock, Kelvin 273!     : Against
> But not here.  I'm with the Baron and Peter on this one for now.  Haven't really heard an argument for this yet, just Wonko saying he was going to propose it next nweek and Raelus actually doing it this time.  Why?

My argument is that 10 ndays is just too long. I get bored. If we cut back the allowable number of proposals from 5 to 4, we'll still get the same average number of proposals per 10 days, they'll just be spread out a bit more and we can play Tiles faster. Also, 8 divides nicely into two 4-nday periods, which I hope to make use of in future props. The 3-4-3 division earlier was just ugly.

-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss