Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Raelus amends p29

[Raelus <raelusaetherira@xxxxxxxxx>]

eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Wait do titles exist yet? Are we allowed to do that? If so i'll just  change my blantant rip of the old titles rule into something else.
>
>
>  
>
> > Raelus has amended p29.
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Proposal 29/8: Duelling
> > A Standard Proposal by Raelus
> > Last modified on nweek 86, nday 10
> >
> > [[rev 1: Fixed minor typos, clarified cases where players fail to complete the 
> > duel, added a bragging clause]]
> > [[rev 2: Changed challengee penalty for declining: they merely lose 1 Amplitude 
> > now. Allows challenger to make a new challenge, provided they do not Duel the 
> > same person ... Also clarified the maximum wager.]]
> > [[rev 3: reducing time between duels]]
> > [[rev 4: further reduced time; changed name; fixed the Viktor Vine]]
> > [[rev 5: Viktor Vine, again.]]
> > [[rev 6: Removed penalty for declining a duel.]]
> > [[rev 7/8: Fixed a pronoun, added "Duel Master" title.]]
> > Add a new rule to Section 3 entitled "Duelling":
> > {{
> >
> >
> > A player may challenge another player to a Duel, which may be referred to as 
> > Duelling. Duelling is a game action. Any one player may only challenge another 
> > player to a duel once every one nweek. The player challenging may wager a 
> > postive amount of Amplitude no more than one-third (rounded up) of the lowest 
> > Amplitude among the players participating, and must state the wager with their 
> > challenge. The player receiving the challenge must accept the Duel, or decline 
> > it within one nweek. If the player receiving the challenge does not respond, e 
> > is considered to have declined the Duel.
> >
> > If the Duel is declined, the challenger may ignore the one nweek limit on 
> > Duelling.
> >
> > If the Duel is accepted, both players must roll N six-sided dice (see 
> > HowToRollDice) to the business list within one nweek, where N is the amount of 
> > Amplitude wagered. A player's results shall be added together, this is eir Duel 
> > score. The player with the higher Duel score is the Viktor. The Viktor receives 
> > the wager in Amplitude, whereas the other player loses that amount of Amplitude. 
> > The Viktor may also brag about eir victory for the next nweek. In case the 
> > players are tied, both must roll a six-sided dice to the business list within 
> > one nweek, and subtract it from eir duel score.
> >
> > If only one player fails to roll eir dice within the time limit, eir opponent is 
> > considered the Viktor. If both players fail to roll eir dice, the Duel becomes 
> > void. However, the limitation on challenges still applies to the challenger.
> >
> > Viktor Vines are game objects, which are nontradable. When a player wins a duel, 
> > e receives one Viktor Vine.
> > }}
> > If proposal 39 passes, add the following text to this rule:
> > {{
> > The player(s) with the greatest number of Viktor Vines receive the Title "Duel 
> > Master." Players lose this title if they no longer hold the greatest number of 
> > Viktor Vines.
> > }}
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki.
> > Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be 
> > ignored. Thank you.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >    
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>  
Titles do not yet exist. The proposal states that if proposal 39 has 
passed, the rule should amend itself to add the stuff about titles in. 
Should I reword the proposal to make this clear?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss