eugman on Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:50:49 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] BvS amends p28 |
Well I suppose as long as there is no way to coerce someone into staying a memeber there is no problem. I meant the former . I must have missed the part where you took care of that. Everything looks good. The only quibble left is whether this is a general definition or not. But I really am fine either way. You've got my vote congressperson. > On 4/27/05, eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx <eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > You might meant to make sure it's clear parties may influence but not > > force it's members to do things. I've read on nomic wiki about the mousetrap > > scam a little bit so you can understand why I'm apprehensive. > > If the Party's demands are too out there, the member is welcome to quit at > any time, and their right to quit is protected by the rule that defines > Parties. That prevents such scams from working with this system. But if a > Party can't force its members to do something, then there's no reason for it > to even have its rules, and the system will be pointless. > > Also read about zarpint's tax refuge. > > http://www.bnomic.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ZarpintsTaxShelter > > Maybe if parties can only exist with one person as a member for only a few > > days. > > I'm not sure what your last sentence means - are you suggesting that > Parties should be allowed to survive with only one member for a few days > (which they are), or that even that is too risky? If it's the former, then > there's no problem, and if it's the latter... I suppose someone could create > a temporary tax shelter this way, but only if Parties could hold stuff, > which they can't. The Party itself isn't tangible. It can't own objects, > unlike Societies, which could. > [[BvS]] > > > BvS has amended p28. > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Proposal 28/1: Boxes Within Boxes > > > A Standard Proposal by BvS > > > Last modified on nweek 86, nday 8 > > > > > > Create a new section of the Ruleset named "Generic Definitions" with the > > > following rule in it: > > > > > > {{ > > > == Political Parties == > > > > > > There exist organizations called Political Parties, or Parties. A Player > > of B > > > Nomic may not be a member of more than one Political Party at any given > > time. > > > Each Party must have a uniquely identifying name. > > > > > > Each Political Party must have a Platform. A Party's Platform is a Game > > Document > > > laying out the set of beliefs that members of that Party hold [[such as > > what > > > should be legal in the Game, what the direction of the Game should be, > > how the > > > Game should be played, etc.]]. The purpose of a Party's existence is the > > > promotion of these beliefs. > > > > > > Each Political Party must have a Chair, who is a member of that Party. > > The Chair > > > of a Party is the leader of that Party, responsible for representing the > > Party's > > > interests in debate (when appropriate) and creating a list each nweek of > > which > > > proposals on the Ballot for that nweek are supported or opposed by eir > > Party. > > > Parties may also have no stance on a proposal [[and it is suggested that > > Parties > > > exercise this option rather than simply opposing props they don't > > support, to > > > prevent partisanship from freezing the Game]]. Each Party's list, known > > as that > > > Party's Line, must be sent before voting begins each nweek, to all > > members of > > > that Party at a minimum. [[It is requested but not required that Party > > Chairs > > > post their Party Line in a public forum.]] > > > > > > A Player who is not a member of any Party may create a new Party by > > posting its > > > name and Platform in a public forum. That player becomes the new Party's > > Chair. > > > If at any time there have been fewer than two members of a Party for > > more than > > > three ndays, the Party is disbanded. A Player may leave their Party at > > any time > > > by stating their intention to leave in a public forum. No restriction > > may be > > > placed on a Player's ability to leave their Party. > > > > > > Each Political Party is responsible for establishing its own internal > > rules > > > regarding the selection of Chairs, modification of its Platform, > > requirements > > > for joining (if any), conformity to the Party Line, and internal > > positions other > > > than Chair, as well as any other rules the Party's members wish. A > > Party's > > > internal rules and workings may not directly influence the Gamestate or > > any > > > Player who is not a member of that Party, but may directly influence the > > members > > > of the Party. > > > }} > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss