Jeremy Cook on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:18:18 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Zarpint amends p1984 |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:51:46PM -0500, Peter Cooper Jr. wrote: > Zarpint writes: > > Proposal 1984/4: Alcohol again > > Create the following Rule: > [... snip ...] > > When a Player Ferments a Fruit, the Fruit changes into an X Drink, > > where X was the type of Fruit. An X Drink is a Drink for all values of > > X. The new Drink is in the possession of the Player who fermented the > > Fruit. > > This is the "something else" with Fruits that I wanted but couldn't > think of a good idea. > > However, I'm kinda curious what a Thorn Seed Drink tastes like, and > don't want to try to find out what a Rotten Tomato Drink tastes > like. :) > > > If a Player's BAC is ever greater than or equal to 10, that Player > > becomes Blacked Out. If a Blacked Out Player's BAC is ever less than > > 10, e is no longer Blacked Out. A Blacked Out Player may not take any > > Action. > > Not take any Action seems a bit harsh... And I think it would prevent > Forfeiting as well. Have you ever tried to do anything after blacking out? And r14 states: "No restrictions may be placed on when a player may forfeit; any player may forfeit the game at any time." r14 takes precedence over this. > > > Any Action done by any Player has a probability of X/10 of not taking > > place, where X is that Player's BAC. > > Is the player doing the action responsible for throwing the dice? For > something like making a move in a subgame, couldn't the player just > try again (since the action didn't take place, they didn't make a move > yet this checking period, and thus could try again)? No, whoever is supposed to recognize the Action is. And yes, they could try again. > > > When any Player Votes in a Ballot, the Chairman must do the following > > X times, where X is that Player's BAC: choose one of the Polls in the > > Ballot and randomly change the Player's vote to either Yes or No with > > equal probability. > > This sounds like the Chair gets to choose which Poll to change > randomly. While I like the sound of that as the current Chair, you > might want to make the Poll choice random as well. And, it'd currently > be possible for the Chair to choose the same Poll more than once, I'd > think. Yes, that's the point. > > If the person doesn't vote at all, does it get randomly changed from > Abstain to something else? Yes. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss