Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] PlayerPersonman submits p1926

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 17, 2004, at 2.42 PM, Jake Eakle wrote:

> Well, despite it's inadequcy for other purposes, the rule about no 
> referring
> to specific players would stop that from working.. Also, the voting 
> thing
> wouldn't work, since after the first time no players on the Subscriber 
> list
> would be able to do that, so the game couldn't either. However, I'm 
> sure
> there are plenty of other ways it could be abused, though, which is 
> why I
> intend to edit it as soon as i get people's opinions on the matter 
> *hint
> hint*

I would definitely like them to be proposal-created. Otherwise there's 
too much potential for people using them to get around the "no infinite 
actions" restriction. It would also be too easy for players to screw 
Ministers by suddenly dumping all sorts of automation work on them.

If that were fixed, I'd like the prop.

Oh, and it also might help to either make a Duty for maintaining the 
List, or require the proponents of new Triggers to add them if the 
props pass.

--
Wonko

< > ! * ' ' #
^ @ ` $ $ -
! * ' $ , _
% * < > #4
& ) . . /
| { ~ ~  System Halted

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss