Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] PlayerPersonman submits p1926

[Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 10:45:11AM -0700, Jake Eakle wrote:
> You're very right about that, and zarpint had some good points too. Perhaps
> the best would be if Triggers could only be created by proposing them? This
> way only triggers that benefit the majority (such as the paying for vines
> one, a paying taxes one, etc.) would pass...
> 
> And i really should prolly get rid of the whole starred actions thing. I
> don't think there is an elegant way i could make that not cause all sorts of
> insanity... or even a really cheap dirty way. So lemme know what you all
> think and i'll edit it soon.

It would be so much fun. I can guarantee an SOE quickly if it passes.

If it passed, I would create the following Triggers:

{{
If there are any players in the game, (*) create a copy of this Trigger.
}}

{{
If any proposal authored by Zarpint the Incomplete is on the Ballot, and
this has not yet triggered 1000 times in the current nweek, (*) vote YES on all
proposals authored by Zarpint the Incomplete.
}}

{{
If any proposal with the text " Give the player known as Zarpint the
Incomplete 1 point." is on the Ballot, and this has not yet triggered
1000 times in the current nweek, (*) vote YES on all such props.
}}

{{
If this has not yet triggered 1000 times in the current nweek, (*)
propose the following:
{{ Give the player known as Zarpint the Incomplete 1 point. }}
}}

Zarpint
> 
> personman
> 
> 
> On 10/17/04 10:38 AM, "Daniel Lepage" <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Oct 16, 2004, at 6.09 PM, wonko@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> >> ---------------------------------
> >> Proposal 1926/0: Conditional Triggers
> >> A Standard Proposal by PlayerPersonman
> >> Last modified on nweek 71, nday 3
> >> 
> >> Add a rule:
> >> {{
> >> _Conditional Triggers_
> >> <snip>
> >> }}
> > 
> > This proposal frightens me. This looks too much like a more advanced
> > version of Automation scripts, which had less-than-ideal implications
> > for the administrator when last we used them - suddenly Dave had to
> > remember what everyone had signed up to do and do it for them, rather
> > than being reminded when they announced it. Dave really hated
> > automation scripts (and societies, actually) because they allowed
> > players to take actions without ever actually telling anyone.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss