Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Monty

[Araltaln <smgafkjen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Glotmorf wrote:

> On 2 Aug 2004 at 15:20, Jeremy Cook wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:54:10PM -0500, Araltaln wrote:
> >
> > > Jeremy Cook wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 02:37:15PM -0400, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well, maybe not Fortran.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm tempted to outlaw requests for COBOL programs just on general
> > > > principles.
> > >
> > > Is INTERCAL still okay?
> >
> > We should probably double the bonus for INTERCAL. In fact, if you use
> > the multi-valued logic version n-INTERCAL, we should multiply the
> > bonus by n.
> >
> > I also like Befunge and BrainFuck.
>
>
> Dare I suggest this is an instance that warrants explicit 
> inclusion?  Before someone submits scripts in a non-english-
> based version of a language?

That won't help all that much, will it? If I can write an interpreter 
for it in Python (or any other explicitly included language), I'll still 
be able to use it. (IOBNCC, anyone?)

--Araltaln
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss