Daniel Lepage on Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:14:03 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] RE: [Spoon-business] Hats Off to Drunken Theft



On Jun 16, 2004, at 11.00 PM, Craig wrote:

Hats on, gentlemen

You realize there already exist Hats, right?

The current definition doesn't quite conflict with my new one. The current rule is a Hat definition that happens not to be in the Hat Box, and that defines many, many Hats.

Unless, of course, we do the massive repeal thing; neither version leaves
Hats. But I think this should wait until after we've done it.

I don't really like the idea of throwing out everything and starting from scratch... I'd like B Nomic to be a long-lived game, not a dozen short-lived games.

BTW, should Hats pass, Hat definitions will be on the Wiki. I encourage everyone to set up whatever they thing needs setting up on the Wiki, and y'all should make yourself login accounts as well.

--
Wonko
"Write a wise saying and your name will live forever"
     -Anonymous

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss