Daniel Lepage on Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:14:03 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] RE: [Spoon-business] Hats Off to Drunken Theft |
On Jun 16, 2004, at 11.00 PM, Craig wrote:
Hats on, gentlemenYou realize there already exist Hats, right?
The current definition doesn't quite conflict with my new one. The current rule is a Hat definition that happens not to be in the Hat Box, and that defines many, many Hats.
Unless, of course, we do the massive repeal thing; neither version leavesHats. But I think this should wait until after we've done it.
I don't really like the idea of throwing out everything and starting from scratch... I'd like B Nomic to be a long-lived game, not a dozen short-lived games.
BTW, should Hats pass, Hat definitions will be on the Wiki. I encourage everyone to set up whatever they thing needs setting up on the Wiki, and y'all should make yourself login accounts as well.
-- Wonko "Write a wise saying and your name will live forever" -Anonymous _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss