[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] gnusto

[Bill Adlam <sagitta_elegans@xxxxxxxxx>]

Zarpint wrote: 

> Well, good, because there's more to do.

My aim in p1846 was simply to fix some anomalies in the ruleset as it
stands.  If you want to set up laws for
making/using/restricting/freeing slaves, propose away.

> Sagitta, I don't understand the slavery prop, because it's not
> explicitly
> stated that a player can affect the state of eir slave or its
> property.

A player should be able to affect a slave by, for example,
administering a Kick In The Ass.  This is currently forbidden by r636.

> And slaves shouldn't be allowed to have property. 

Not even points, titles, the Pink Scarf and bandwidth chits?  

> And what does "affect emself" mean? 
> Does it include taking actions like proposing?

Yes it does, since by making a prop the slave changes the number of
bandwidth chits in eir possession.  Again, currently forbidden by r636.

> And what can I do with a slave if I have one?

Nothing special, at the moment.  But I'm sure you can imagine some
fiendish ideas.

Sagitta


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" 
your friends today! Download Messenger Now 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss