Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 60 Ballot

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:59:01 -0500, Glotmorf <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2004 at 12:30, SkArcher wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'm disappointed about that.  I would prefer a
> requirement for explicit resubmission (even if for free)
> rather than an automatic carryover.  Wasn't it Wonko's voting
> prop that got shelved twice, then passed, without a single
> change made to it?

Yes, it was. That is the prop my other prop would redact upon passage.

As it is I tried to make this prop work as a simple but effective method 
of modifying proposals to allow them to continue, with a bandwidth cost of 
less than the submission of an actual new prop to encourage perfection of 
proposals, and yet a low enough cost to make it feasable. As it goes 
however, It seems that I will have nto do the very very complex version, 
which essentially does exactly the same damn thing with added text and 
loopholes.


SkArcher 
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss