|SkArcher on Sun, 28 Mar 2004 05:53:55 -0600 (CST)|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 60 Ballot|
On 28 Mar 2004 at 12:30, SkArcher wrote: Yeah, I'm disappointed about that. I would prefer a requirement for explicit resubmission (even if for free) rather than an automatic carryover. Wasn't it Wonko's voting prop that got shelved twice, then passed, without a single change made to it?
Yes, it was. That is the prop my other prop would redact upon passage.As it is I tried to make this prop work as a simple but effective method of modifying proposals to allow them to continue, with a bandwidth cost of less than the submission of an actual new prop to encourage perfection of proposals, and yet a low enough cost to make it feasable. As it goes however, It seems that I will have nto do the very very complex version, which essentially does exactly the same damn thing with added text and loopholes.
spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss