Re: [spoon-discuss] Comments

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:11:16 -0500, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> If it's possible, Dave, it would be very helpful if the ballot email 
> mentioned when votes were due. I suspect that a number of people meant 
> to vote earlier this past nweek, but didn't because they thought they 
> had more time.

Yes, I did. I made my initial "i vote yes on everything" because I thought 
I might not have time... well, i was probably right.

> Dave said:
> > Proposal 1812/0 (Standardized Elections) (Wonko):
> > AFF: Baron von Skippy, bd, SkArcher, The Voice
> > NEG: Sagitta, Zarpint
> > Counts (Y/N/A/S) : (4-2-0-0). Measure passes. Wonko gains 12 points.
> > Created r1823/0.
> > Created r1824/0.
>
> What the hell? I made this something like four nweeks ago, decided it 
> was a dumb idea, voted against it, and left. Then it gets shelved three 
> times and finally passes? What happened?

Somebody (You, I believe) removed the clause where props shelved for 2 
weeks in a row without alteration (or 3 weeks in a row with) were 
automatically trashed.

I'm going to prop to fix this, I'm just working on the details. I'm also 
going to prop to reverse the changes made by this prop, which I intended 
to tripple vote against to utterly kill.

In fact, I'll do that now;

I propose;

{{
__Lather, Rinse, Repeat__

Reverse all change made to the rules by prop 1812. Rules created are 
repealed, rules modified by p1812 are revised to read as the did before 
p1812 passed

}}

> I will now go to Brazil. I remain On Leave.

Have fun.


--
 SkArcher
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss