Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 56 RESULTS

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:57:59 -0600, Baron von Skippy <bvs@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> > > Does this help any?-
> >
> > nope, sounds like it;
> >
> > a) screws with time
> >
> > and;
> >
> > b) creates a paradoxical condition under the current ruleset. If comes 
> > to
> > this, I will recognize an SoE
> >
> >
> > However, my take on the matter is that the rule exists, but the items 
> > are
> > unusable because they screw with time and that rule takes precedence.
> -Well, if the rule exists, then Dave has three Deus Ex Ovum (which do 
> not cause a paradox, as they undo /everything/ at once) to fix any 
> problems caused by someone deciding that they value being a dick more 
> than those 50 points, which means that if we ever make it to the end of 
> the nweek (we'll run out of points to run the Rod eventually, I 
> suppose), I can propose to fix these problems. If the rule doesn't 
> exist, I'll repropose it with more safeguards. Jeez... and to think, 
> this was proposed to /prevent/ paradoxes from screwing us over.-

Messing about with time	to prevent paradoxes falls into the same category 
as Fucking for Virginity and going to War for Peace, in my book Baron.


SkArcher
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss