Re: [spoon-discuss] so do we have a game or not?

[Zarpint Jeremy Cook <mcfoufou@xxxxxxxxx>]

I understand what you mean. It just seems like that would be a difficult
way to do the removal, rather than just proposing to remove a few. I like
having dozens of weird things that only occasionally get used. Are there
many specific things you want removed?

Of your list:

Gremlins are fun, but we haven't heard from them much. We need more of them.

Cards need to be further developed, which we're doing.

Gender needs to be either eliminated or made much more complicated.

The rest needs to stay IMHO.

Zarpint



On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> I agree with this sentiment; but I also agree that a lot of things
> could be removed without harming any of the good points you've
> mentioned. And one way to do that would be to rewrite the ruleset from
> scratch; we could just put back in everything we wanted to keep.
>
> My question was not meant as a proclamation that we should start over,
> but merely as a way of identifying what parts of the ruleset people
> care about, and what parts could be nicely removed.


-- 
Zarpint            "All thy toiling only breeds new dreams, new dreams;
Jeremy Cook         there is no truth saving in thine own heart."
mcfoufou@xxxxxxxxx       --W.B. Yeats, The Song of the Happy Shepherd
grep -r kibo /     "Movements are the problem, not the answer to problems."
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss