Re: [spoon-discuss] so do we have a game or not?

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 16, 2004, at 6:14 PM, SkArcher wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:11:56 -0500, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>
> > We do have a game, as most rules take precedence over the Eclair rule.
> >
> > We do not have PGo or Cards (they're there, but we can't use them).
>
> except for the fact as Zarpint pointed out, that referencing is an 
> action not defined in the rules, and so is functionally a chocolate 
> eclair
>
>
> Still, i have to say that it might be easier at this point to start 
> anew

The game has been running for over two years now; I'd rather not see it 
die.

That said, we could effectively begin anew by repealing most rules and 
rebuilding... B Nomic Round 2, if you will.

But to really do this well, we'd have to scrap everything unnecessary 
in the ruleset - otherwise it's not worth doing. So the question is, is 
the cleanliness of a new ruleset really worth giving up...
BNS?
Charm?
Activity?
BAC?
Style?
Gremlins?
The Pink Scarf?
The LOGAS?
Gender?
Respect?
Alcohol?
The Quote Book?
Literary Forms?
Societies?
Cards?
PGo?
etc...

I guess really the question is, if we had to abandon the game and start 
over, what would we keep?

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss