[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Roster

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 11:45 PM, SkArcher wrote:

> Been meaning to do this for a while. Part tidy-up, part necessary.
>
> I propose;
>
> {{__The Roster__
>
> ammend rule 24 to read;
>
> {{
>
> A.There exists a document called The Roster. The Roster consists of a 
> list. The Roster shall contain entries for each Proposing Entity, Lost 
> Soul and Society. The Roster shall also contain the time, in Ntime and 
> real time (dateline UTC).
>
> B.1.Entries for Players must show the Players Name, eir Dimensions and 
> a list of any other attributes associated with em.

You might want to specify 'public' attributes - I don't think we have 
any secret attributes right now, but we might at some point.

> B.2.Entries for Lost Souls must show the Lost Souls name, the date e 
> joined and the date e left B Nomic and any other name e had been known 
> as.
>
> B.3.Entries for Societies must show the Name of the Society, a list of 
> the members of that society, any Bandwidth or Dimensions possessed by 
> the Society and a link to the Charter of that Society.
>
> C.Updating the Roster shall be a Duty, known as The Roster Duty.
>
> }}
>
> add a susection to section D of rule 1583 [[Duties]];
>
> {{
> The Roster Duty.
> The Roster Duty shall Require Attention at the begining of the nweek, 
> if there

So we won't keep a running total of players' scores?

> has been any change made to the information that should be noted on 
> The Roster in the preceeding nweek. It is the responsibility of the 
> Player carrying out
> The Roster Duty to ammend The Roster so that it shows the correct 
> information
                      ^ the word 'ammend' needs one fewer m.

> and make it available, either in a Public Forum or on an accessable 
> webpage [[Rob, can we use the Wiki for this?]]. The Perk for 
> performing The Roster Duty shall be 10 points.
>
> }}
>
> }}

At some point the Generic Nomic Data Tracker was brought up (see 
http://kevan.org/generic ); a system like that might be the best, 
rather than simply using a Wiki, as it better allows people to log the 
reasons for the changes and whatnot (so that we don't have one person 
updating the Wiki to give a player the 20 points e just got, then 
another player doing it again without realizing the points have already 
been added)

> comments, questions, nitpicks? Oh, it needs keywords, but i'll sort 
> that tomorrow when I can track down exactly what keywords it needs in 
> Wonkos new system (suggestions will be accepted, hint hint).

Hmmmm... some things are harder to categorize...

I'd suggest that 24 get Objects:Roster, Duties:Roster, Objects:Players, 
Objects:Societies, maybe? I dunno - does this seem like something you'd 
want to see if you looked up players or societies? Maybe not...

How about: (Objects:Roster, Duties:Roster, Gameplay:Reporting:Roster) ?

If we're planning on seriously remodeling the ruleset, though, I may 
just wait until we've done so and then go through and propose new 
keywords for whatever we have left.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss