David E. Smith on 25 Nov 2003 00:41:57 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: spoon-discuss Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17 |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, [iso-8859-1] Bill Adlam wrote: > You're right, I was misreading Rule 14. I thought posting to the forum > caused an External Force to join the game by an undefined mechanism, > rather than being an Action that could itself alter the gamestate. > Almost all of the proposal is redundant, then, and I'll fatal flaw it. You could revise the prop so that it instead replaces Rule 14, with appropriate additions as required. I don't think your Fatal Flaw notation counts yet, since I believe it has to be in a Voting Period for votes to be considered (and unless it's changed recently, Fatal Flaw counts as a vote). And since I've been up to my ears in cranky Win2K mail server, it's technically still nday 3. (It'll magically become nday 4 in a couple hours.) ...dave _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss