Rob Speer on 15 Sep 2003 00:31:22 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] [PGo] Alliance


On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 07:48:08PM -0400, Rob Speer wrote:
> Also, with your interpretation, _any_ stone surrounded by _any_ other
> stones dies. For example, if your stones ended up like this:
> 
> W W W
> W W W
> W W W
> 
> The middle one would die, because it is in a set of one stone belonging
> to you and, say, Iain, surrounded by stones that are not in mutual
> alliances with you and Iain.

I'm slightly wrong here - you would have to be allied with someone. In
that case, if you allied with Iain, then the middle stone would be a
dragon of you and Iain and be captured by your surrounding stones.

And I'm not saying this interpretation is valid. I'm trying to show that
it makes no sense.
-- 
Rob Speer

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss