Rob Speer on 15 Sep 2003 00:31:22 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] [PGo] Alliance |
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 07:48:08PM -0400, Rob Speer wrote: > Also, with your interpretation, _any_ stone surrounded by _any_ other > stones dies. For example, if your stones ended up like this: > > W W W > W W W > W W W > > The middle one would die, because it is in a set of one stone belonging > to you and, say, Iain, surrounded by stones that are not in mutual > alliances with you and Iain. I'm slightly wrong here - you would have to be allied with someone. In that case, if you allied with Iain, then the middle stone would be a dragon of you and Iain and be captured by your surrounding stones. And I'm not saying this interpretation is valid. I'm trying to show that it makes no sense. -- Rob Speer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss