Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The ruleset

[Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:44:59 -0500, Baron von Skippy <bvs@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> > Like I said, I did it just to be safe, not because I'm eager to destroy 
> > the game. If the ruleset is still intact, then my actions have no effect 
> > and this whole thing is over. If not (which I would argue to be the 
> > case, although the general consensus seems to be otherwise), I wanted to 
> > make sure no one hijacked my scam. Certainly that isn't deserving of 
> > Kickings of Ass, right?
>
> -Actually, it is. See, a /nice/ scammer would have rewritten the rules, 
> declared a win, and then put the rules back the way they were... that's 
> my biggest problem with this idea. I'm fine with people screwing around, 
> as long as it doesn't leave any lasting marks.
>
> Also, if general consensus is that your scam isn't legal, who's gonna 
> "hijack" it?-

As I said earlier, I was going to restore the ruleset once it was agreed 
that I did, in fact, win. And "general consensus" is not synonymous with 
"unanimous agreement".

--The Pusher Robot
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss