Baron von Skippy on 9 Aug 2003 04:38:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Oops |
>>>> For Unbridled Hostility towards all other players in this game, I >>>> Kick >>>> The Pusher Robot in the Ass. >>>> >>>> Rationale: Granting oneself god powers is so passe.- >>> >>> I don't see how it's hostile, especially if it failed - doing nothing >>> isn't unkind to anyone. And of course, if it succeeded, kicks in the >>> ass aren't here anymore; so either way this fails. >> -It isn't hostile. This is the problem. People are doing many things >> which scream "kick my ass," which I interpret to mean "Kick me In The >> Ass." Unfortunately, there's no provision, so we apply a blanket >> rationale and see if Dave's annoyed enough to agree. Maybe we should >> be allowed to Kick people for just being annoying... nah, that'd be >> abused 47 million times in the first day.- >>> >>> Besides, if anyone ought to be kicked, it's everyone who voted for >>> your >>> two silly props - random silliness is okay, but not as part of the >>> rules. >> -My prop was no sillier or damaging than the last time I changed Rule >> 1 - to add the motto. Don't blame me for this lunacy.- > >You proposed to make us a Nation, and voted to repeal the laws of all >nations... -Oh, yes, and since I was the only player who voted, it all comes down to me. Yes, that makes lots of sense...- > >>> I think in the future we ought to make a habit of voting against silly >>> proposals; the last one that passed (IT) also caused a lot of >>> unintentional trouble, IIRC. >> -Yes, let's just make dour, serious props. Take all the silliness out. >> Yee-ha that sounds like fun. Whoop-de-freaking-do. We're gonna party >> all nweek long. Or we could continue to screw around in this game and >> actually keep it fun...- > >I don't mean stop making silly props, or even stop voting for them; I >mean stop voting for silly props that shouldn't actually make a >difference. Silly props are the basis of the game - things like Kicks >in the Ass and Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster Gnomes are inherently silly >- but things like "let's make us a nation", "let's destroy anything >that's a nation", and "let's make something called IT that does nothing >and everything so we can shoot CFI's at each other for a while" are >needless silliness. It's like cheese. If you build a house out of >string cheese, it's really silly, but at least it keeps the rain out >until the dingos eat the walls. If you build a whiffle bat out of >string cheese, it's really silly, but at least... no, it's just really >silly. IID drives are like string cheese houses. Sovereignty >declarations are like string cheese whiffle bats. > In other words, let's not vote for silliness if it doesn't improve the >game. > -You lost me when you began talking about violating zoning ordinances. Seriously, though, if it's too silly for you (as if such a thing exists!), vote against it. I like total randomness in this game. It's a reason to keep coming back day after day. So, unless doing so would obviously screw everything up completely, I'm more or less likely to vote for something that adds a little silliness. Now, it does have to be functional silliness if it wants to add a new rule, I'll grant that much.- [[BvS]] _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss