Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] I'm baack... again.

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 09:28  PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:

> > > > I return from leave, with the full intention of keeping with it and
> > > > staying
> > > > back this time.
> > > >
> > > > ...You've been busy, haven't you?  Repealing rules every which way.
> > > > Ah,
> > > > anyway-- less for me to remember, no?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and I heard about those spiffy @bnomic.org email addresses, how
> > > > do I get
> > > > mine?
> > > >
> > > > -0-the voice-0-
> > >
> > > I think you have been garbage collected....
> > >
> > > at any rate, welcome back if you are back, if not, you will have to
> > > wait until we can have new players again...
> >
> > It doesn't matter whether or not e's been garbage collected; for the
> > same reason Iain was still a player, so's the Voice.
> -You mean someone else scooped him up and used a society to vote for 
> him, thus keeping his Activity from dropping for three nweeks? I must 
> have missed that.-

Sorry, I meant the same reason WC was still a player.

> > Meanwhile new players *can* join anyway, so either way, e's back.
> -We aren't so sure about that, and last I checked, you don't get to 
> make blanket statements about what's legal and what isn't. So e 
> /might/ be back, and then again, e might not. Ah, what wonderful times 
> we live in...-

E's not back because e never left - E still fits the definition of a 
player, and the garbage collection rule doesn't have enough Chutzpah to 
make em cease to be a player, because the player rule says e still 
qualifies.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss