Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 46 BALLOT

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 09:08  PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:
> > > > > Proposal 1603/1: Political Go (Rob)
> > > >
> > > > Shelve. As this subgame depends on the rules defining 'players' and
> > > > 'checkpoints', it would not be 'the application of a single rule';
> > > > therefore, under r1592, it would have no effect.
> > > -Well, in that case no subgame can exist. Great. Anyone else want to
> > > completely ignore this?-
> >
> > I'd say we'd best repeal r1592.
>
> -I think we need to give Dave "screw that" powers. It would solve this 
> problem and so many others if we could ignore a rule long enough to 
> patch the hole in it. Not holes that lead to scams, mind you, but 
> problems like we'd get if this proposal passes.-

The Council of Elders was supposed to do that, I think; but it never 
worked. And now it's gone. Or asleep. Or something.

> > > > > Proposal 1612/0: What does not kill me nets me a title (Fatally
> > > > > 		 Flawed) (Baron von Skippy)
> > > >
> > > > No. Because even with a Fatal Flaw, you'll still lose points.
> > > -You know, there's a wide line between "friendly competition" and
> > > "being a royal ass," and you've crossed it.-
> >
> > You gave me a choice between effectively voting to give you extra
> > bandwidth, and voting to take away a few of your points. What did you
> > expect me to do? :)
> -Vote "yes" or abstain. You know, like most everyone else is doing.-

And what does that do for me? Besides lose me points, I mean.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss