|Daniel Lepage on 31 Jul 2003 01:13:52 -0000|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 46 BALLOT|
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 09:08 PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:
Proposal 1603/1: Political Go (Rob)Shelve. As this subgame depends on the rules defining 'players' and 'checkpoints', it would not be 'the application of a single rule'; therefore, under r1592, it would have no effect.-Well, in that case no subgame can exist. Great. Anyone else want to completely ignore this?-I'd say we'd best repeal r1592.-I think we need to give Dave "screw that" powers. It would solve this problem and so many others if we could ignore a rule long enough to patch the hole in it. Not holes that lead to scams, mind you, but problems like we'd get if this proposal passes.-
The Council of Elders was supposed to do that, I think; but it never worked. And now it's gone. Or asleep. Or something.
Proposal 1612/0: What does not kill me nets me a title (Fatally Flawed) (Baron von Skippy)No. Because even with a Fatal Flaw, you'll still lose points.-You know, there's a wide line between "friendly competition" and "being a royal ass," and you've crossed it.-You gave me a choice between effectively voting to give you extra bandwidth, and voting to take away a few of your points. What did you expect me to do? :)-Vote "yes" or abstain. You know, like most everyone else is doing.-
And what does that do for me? Besides lose me points, I mean. -- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss