Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 46 BALLOT

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 12:46  AM, Baron von Skippy wrote:

> > > Proposal 1589/1: Setting Stuff on Fire For Fun and Profit (Baron von
> > > Skippy)
> >
> > No. And for Unbridled Hostility towards Anything McGee, I kick the
> > Baron in the Ass. Anything found the hole, and didn't even seriously
> > exploit it; this is a pure ripoff of Anything's scam. I especially
> > disagree with the proposed titles - if anyone deserves to be "Lord of
> > the Failure Scam", it's Mr. McGee.
>
> -Apologies to Mr. McGee, but it is because e did /not/ seriously 
> exploit this scam that e doesn't get a "Lord" title. And your Kick is 
> unjustified - not granting someone respect is not hostility. And how 
> many times have you ripped someone off? I remember having about 600 
> points at one point, up until someone - probably you - pulled a scam 
> that destroyed them. That's hostile if this is, wouldn't you say?-

By 'Rip someone off' I do not mean 'cause someone to lose points'. I 
mean that e found a perfectly good scam and you grabbed it. I'll 
concede that since e didn't exploit it, e probably shouldn't get a 
'lord' title; but I definitely don't think that anyone else should get 
one. 'Lord' should be reserved for people who did something clever and 
got a Win from it; all you did was take Anything McGee's cleverness and 
try to get a Win from it. Which is perhaps knightworthy, but certainly 
not lordworthy.

> > > Proposal 1603/1: Political Go (Rob)
> >
> > Shelve. As this subgame depends on the rules defining 'players' and
> > 'checkpoints', it would not be 'the application of a single rule';
> > therefore, under r1592, it would have no effect.
> -Well, in that case no subgame can exist. Great. Anyone else want to 
> completely ignore this?-

I'd say we'd best repeal r1592.

> > > Proposal 1612/0: What does not kill me nets me a title (Fatally
> > > 		 Flawed) (Baron von Skippy)
> >
> > No. Because even with a Fatal Flaw, you'll still lose points.
> -You know, there's a wide line between "friendly competition" and 
> "being a royal ass," and you've crossed it.-

You gave me a choice between effectively voting to give you extra 
bandwidth, and voting to take away a few of your points. What did you 
expect me to do? :)

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss