Re: RE: [spoon-discuss] If the Failure Scam works...

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

19/07/2003 05:36:52, "Craig" <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>...then someone ought to try doing it with a refresh proposal. Because
>that
>>>would cause utter chaos.
>>>
>
>>No, refreshes don't work via the standard voting rule, they work only
>through the agency of Rule 0, so it wouldn't work in the same way
>
>True. Now the question is, is the difference great enough to stop the scam -
>if indeed it works at all; I'm still skeptical on that one.

Yes, because the scam, if it works, relies on the phrase 'Other effects specifically related to proposal failure, such as Charm and Entropy adjustments, 
occur.' from rule 15. rule 0 does not have that text or anyhting equivalent.


SkArcher



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss