RE: [spoon-discuss] My missing prop

["Craig" <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>>> -Interesting note... well, I proposed to give
>>>> SkArcher a Lord title. That suit you as well? Oh,
>>>> and is everyone satisfied with the name I gave the
>>>> scam? It can also be changed.-
>>
>>>Color me suited.
>>
>>>I can't decide if this is weirder than the DimShip
>>>Scam.  It's definitely weirder than the Stock
>>>Scam...Should we have a Scam Archive with the scams
>>>ranked by relative weirdness?
>>
>>Oh, yes, we should. Definitely. Someone should write up summaries of old
>>scams for it.
>>
>>Also, we should declare that all our players are encouraged to engage in
>>guerilla warfare against other Nomics, and that scams not in B which are
>>acts of war a) get points in B Nomic for their perpetrators and b) go in
the
>>archive with the local scams.
>>
>-Even scams which fail, although not so much of a bonus there. It's the
thought that counts. Actually... hmm, I may use up my bandwidth this
>nweek, at this rate...-

Darn it, if I had included a self-amendment clause in the charter of TTS, I
could work whatever you wanted in.

But then nobody would trust me not to change the charter at the last minute
to read "Teucer is awarded a win" or some such. Which I probably would.

 -- Teucer

"Next meeting, electroshock devices go under everyone's chairs."
 -John Cowan

ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx
teucer@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss