Baron von Skippy on 19 Jul 2003 02:43:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Foomp |
>>> Either is a valid interpretation according to the rules; game custom, >>> precedent, common sense, spirit of the game, etc. all suggest that it >>> works the way we've been using it. >> >> Nothing stops the value from being a real number, but the rules do >> explicitly state that it can be "any real number" as well. A good case >> can >> be made that the string is allowed. I'm not sure how I would judge a >> CFJ on >> it, but it isn't obvious that BvS is worng. > >I agree that it could be interpreted that way; but I think any rational >judge would have to interpret it the other way. -I wonder how many lawyers have said that same thing in how many lawsuits in how many courtrooms, and been wrong? Anyway, if you want a rational judge, you're looking at something like a 50-50 chance in this game.- > >Besides which, merely saying that it can take on that value doesn't >mean you can set it to that value. If it said that it was possible to >move to that value, then you could; but the rules also say that, say, >your votes *can* take on the value 'yes' on all my props; that doesn't >mean that I can set them to that value. > -If I'm wrong, though, so are you. I'm using your reasoning. So either you don't win or this hole in the rules starts off another SOE. You know, I'm okay with either? Sure, SOEs are a pain, but better that we fix it than that we have undefined values, you know?- [[BvS]] _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss