Craig on 16 Jul 2003 17:20:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [spoon-discuss] Where do we go from here? |
>>> >>>such actions. (because otherwise, the action could change the rules to >>> >>>nullify Dave's veto before Dave got the chance to). >>> >> >>> >>Dave's veto could be assumed to be retroactive. >>> >> >>> >>>But what happens if you get sick, or go on vacation? Does everything >>> >>>just shut down? >>> >> >>> >>You get a new minister? >>> > >>> >It is far too complicated to just hot potato on the fly like that, Its like wh >>> en teh GridMin vannished >>> > >>> -What ever happens when a Minister goes away? This is a problem with any Minist >>> ry, not just this one. What about a backup Minister? Or something like that? An >>> d don't ask me what happens if the second Minister goes away as well. You might >>> as well ask "what if SkyNet blows us all to kingdom come?" Well, then the Mini >>> stry won't be updated, will it?- >>> >> I've completely lost track of this discussion, but in the context of >>the WoT proposal, one could have both the other Ministers (Amyrlin, >>Dragon, Haran) be responsible for each third, which would give a >>certain layer of backup. >> >-(Haran?) I thought of that, but didn't suggest it because that means, in the two-Minister system I've got, that if one goes, the checks on >the other's power go as well. We need to keep the number of Ministers constant, if not the identities of those Ministers.- How about if each minister has a Backup, and if the minister is out of town, the backup does eir job for em? -- Teucer "Let's vote on how to vote on how to vote!" -Adam Raizen ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx teucer@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss