Re: [spoon-discuss] Subgame?

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 04:26  PM, Daniel Lepage wrote:

> On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 02:22  PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:
>
> > > > It had the significant advantage that it kept track of itself - you 
> > > > made
> > > > a move by posting the new board position to the -business list.
> > >
> > > Say, how do people feel about Chess subgames? That's something else 
> > > that could be tracked as Rob describes.
> > <snip>
> > > Of course, that's not exactly conducive to multiplayer play... but 
> > > perhaps something could be devised.
> >
> > -Ho ho, yes it is... I present for everyone's approval an existing 
> > chess variant, Nomic Chess:
> > http://www.chessvariants.com/multiplayer.dir/nomicchess.html
> > which could be adapted to fit in with our current ruleset, or spliced 
> > in as one massive rule. Or we could go simpler and use the root game, 
> > Chess For Any Number of Players:
> > http://www.chessvariants.com/multiplayer.dir/anynumber.html-
>
> There was also a four player nomic-chess that never really got off the 
> ground called Fourplay... it's archived at 
> http://www.nomic.net/deadgames/fourplay/fourplay.html

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss