Re: [spoon-discuss] Subgame?

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 02:22  PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:

> > > It had the significant advantage that it kept track of itself - you 
> > > made
> > > a move by posting the new board position to the -business list.
> >
> > Say, how do people feel about Chess subgames? That's something else 
> > that could be tracked as Rob describes.
> <snip>
> > Of course, that's not exactly conducive to multiplayer play... but 
> > perhaps something could be devised.
>
> -Ho ho, yes it is... I present for everyone's approval an existing 
> chess variant, Nomic Chess:
> http://www.chessvariants.com/multiplayer.dir/nomicchess.html
> which could be adapted to fit in with our current ruleset, or spliced 
> in as one massive rule. Or we could go simpler and use the root game, 
> Chess For Any Number of Players:
> http://www.chessvariants.com/multiplayer.dir/anynumber.html-

There was also a four player nomic-chess that never really got off the 
ground called Fourplay... it's archived at 
http://www.nomic.net/deadgames/fourplay/fourplay.html

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss