Re: RE: [spoon-discuss] LOGAS

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

28/05/2003 14:08:13, "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 5/27/03 at 5:20 PM Craig wrote:
>
>>>>Can I get a complete copy of the LOGAS somewhere?
>>
>>>I believe it's part of the Roster.
>>
>>Thanks. I've now reread the pseudocode rule. Since what counts as
>>pseudocode
>>can be redefined by precedent, and since everything abhorrent about
>>pseudocode is at least as applicable to real code, I Kick the Pusher Robot
>>in the Ass. Perl is wonderful, but it should not be used for
>>non-programming
>>purposes.
>
>I may have to dispute your kick, son.  If the prop was actually in Perl, it wasn't pseudocode.  It was code.
>
>						Glotmorf

Then I may have to modify either the LOGAS or the rules - after all, given the fact that the rules do not state 
what language proposals must be in, I could make a prop in French, German or Latin and you'd have to rely on 
translation to actually know what it meant.


SkArcher

I'm really tired of people equating the Matrix with christianity. I think it's a disservice to the movie to 
compare it with a thousand pages of confused hallucinogenic gibberish. - Sstory, in a post on slashdot


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss