Re: [spoon-discuss] LOGAS

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 06:15  PM, Mark Karasek wrote:

> On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:20:07 -0400, Craig <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > Can I get a complete copy of the LOGAS somewhere?
> >
> > > I believe it's part of the Roster.
> >
> > Thanks. I've now reread the pseudocode rule. Since what counts as 
> > pseudocode
> > can be redefined by precedent, and since everything abhorrent about
> > pseudocode is at least as applicable to real code, I Kick the Pusher 
> > Robot
> > in the Ass. Perl is wonderful, but it should not be used for non- 
> > programming
> > purposes.
>
> Ah, didn't realize that was on the LOGAS. Anyway, the proposal still 
> stands. What's wrong with pseudocode?

I think people mostly dislike it 'cause the non-programmers get 
confused.
I don't particularly want to have to learn Perl in order to understand 
props... maybe if they were written in Python or C++, that would be 
okay.

Python's certainly more readable than any of the others.

for rule in ruleset:
	rule.text.swapcase()

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss