Re: [spoon-discuss] LOGAS

[Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:15:25 -0500, Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:20:07 -0400, Craig <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > Can I get a complete copy of the LOGAS somewhere?
> >
> > > I believe it's part of the Roster.
> >
> > Thanks. I've now reread the pseudocode rule. Since what counts as 
> > pseudocode
> > can be redefined by precedent, and since everything abhorrent about
> > pseudocode is at least as applicable to real code, I Kick the Pusher 
> > Robot
> > in the Ass. Perl is wonderful, but it should not be used for non- 
> > programming
> > purposes.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
> Ah, didn't realize that was on the LOGAS. Anyway, the proposal still 
> stands. What's wrong with pseudocode?
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

...of course, that wasn't a very good pseudocode proposal since, although 
the proposal itself was in perl, the additions to the rule is was changing 
weren't. I'll do better next time.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss