Daniel Lepage on 14 May 2003 02:14:00 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Force vs. Source |
On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 09:57 PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:
What exactly does the Force have that the Source doesn't? I see:Moving objects just by thinking about it? Nope, that happens all the time in WoT. Destroying things by pointing at them? See pretty much anything from the end of book one on.Jedi Mind Trick? That's basically just a watered-down Compulsion.Can anyone think of anything else? 'Cause otherwise, it's superfluous to have the Force and the Source, because anything done with the Force is available through the Source, which can do everything much more powerfully. We might as well just replace Force with Source.-Lightsabers. And no, Rand's flaming heron-mark doesn't count.-
Lightsabers are not part of the Force. It happens that only Jedi seem to use them, but they do not actually need to be held by a Jedi to work.
My point is that everything that can be done with the Force, can also be done with the Source; the Force is, therefore, effectively a subset of the Power.
-- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss