Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Veni, Vidi, Vacancy

["David E. Smith" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 4 May 2003, Daniel Lepage wrote:

> >>> -No, give it to a newbie... let's see if Emil was listening to any of
> >>> that debate.-
> >>
> >> What is it with newbies and CFIs? I think Dave's random number
> >> generator is biased towards the inexperienced.
> >
> > I thought Dave himself was no longer required to "randomly" select a
> > judge...?
>
> Well, yes, but before that was waived, newbies always seemed to get the
> next CFIs to come along. And even now, Dave claims to use the random
> method anyway, except in special cases; and sure enough, sam nichols
> got CFI 1480. Which reminds me, somebody needs to get that now.

That's the beauty of randomness. It's so gosh-darned random.

I realize there's nothing but my word on which everyone else can rely, but
in most cases, genuine randomness is involved.

You'll notice that (at least) two CFIs have been filed over the last few
days (there may be more, as I've still got 50+ messages to go), and thus
far, neither has been assigned to either SkArcher or Emil.

(Aside: Emil Bleehall, is it in fact acceptable to call you Emil?)

...dave
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss